If fossil fuel companies misled the public about the dangers of their products, should they be required to pay for damages from climate-related disasters?
Articles on Endangerment finding
Displaying all articles
The EPA’s new interpretations are strategically designed to appeal to the current US Supreme Court’s view of agency authority.
And the cost of new cars may not even come down.
Climate change is making people sicker and more vulnerable to disease, doctors and scientists explain. Erasing the federal endangerment finding increases the risk.
A federal judge dealt one blow to the effort when he found the administration had violated the law in handpicking a panel to question climate science.
The American public agrees that vehicle emissions are harmful and should be regulated, and has indicated strong preferences for cars that pollute less.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Economics and Environmental Studies, Wesleyan University
-
Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis
-
Lecturer in Finance, University of Leicester
-
Senior Lecturer in Financial Economics, Loughborough University
-
Professor and Chair, Department of Environmental Health, Boston University
-
Adjunct Associate Professor of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison
-
Professor of Environmental Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison
-
Professor Emeritus of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington
-
Visiting Professor of Law and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University
-
Professor of Law Emeritus, Vermont Law & Graduate School