Ukrainian public attitudes about having nuclear weapons have shifted significantly in 30 years. Kyiv may consider setting up a nuclear programme.
Articles on Ukraine invasion 2022
Displaying 181 - 200 of 1451 articles
Perception as a neutral country has helped Gulf state position itself as a crucial diplomatic player in Ukraine-Russia war. It also serve’s kingdom’s self-interest.
Vladimir Putin wants a few matters cleared up before he will agree to a ceasefire.
More Ukrainians are willing to negotiate for peace now than in the early stages of the conflict − but clear red lines remain for the public.
Denying access to intelligence sharing and satellite information could lead to an existential crisis for Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin will now have to weigh up how to maintain a reset with the US while also pressing for more military success on the battlefield.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s success in bolstering support for Ukraine in Europe following a contentious White House meeting might be an example of his flair for calculated risks. Is a ceasefire close?
European nations have some areas of strength in intelligence gathering, but will need to ramp up their efforts to plug the gap left by the US.
The rationale behind Trump’s suggestion that giving the US an economic stake in Ukraine’s future will prevent another Russian invasion is flawed.
Even if US financial aid is restored, Ukraine will have to mitigate the risk of future disruption – and that could mean a more timid approach.
If the absolute worst should happen, Ukrainian fighters could choose to play a different hand in its war with Russia: insurgency.
US foreign policy is forcing a security rethink, particularly in Europe.
As a possible endgame approaches, Russia is trying to take as much territory as it can.
A US deal that gives Russia more power, and withdraws support from former allies, is likely to cost Washington overall.
The very public falling out will be very difficult for the leaders to recover from.
A fractious meeting in Washington has left Ukrainians wondering what will become of relations with the US.
Trump’s angry outburst at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy illustrated why authoritarians are lousy dealmakers, particularly when autocratic instincts are exacerbated by toxic masculinity.
There’s nothing in the deal about the US guaranteeing Ukraine’s future security.
A majority of Russians are in favor of peace talks, but a very vocal minority eye US overtures with suspicion and contempt.
It’s a ‘very big deal’ says the US president. But will it bring peace and security to Ukraine?
Top contributors
-
Professor of International Security, University of Birmingham
-
Professor of International Security, Jean Monnet Professor of European Security, National University Odesa Law Academy
-
Senior Lecturer in International Politics, Aberystwyth University
-
Professor of International Relations and Security, University of Bradford
-
Associate Professor and Edward and Emily McWhinney Professor in International Relations, Simon Fraser University
-
Senior Lecturer in Military Strategy and Law, University of Portsmouth
-
Professor in the Department of Government, University of Essex
-
Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Russian and Post-Soviet Politics, University of Bath
-
Professor of International Politics in the Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham
-
Professor of International Security, School of Global Affairs, Lancaster University
-
Professor of Military History, University of Calgary
-
Professor of History and Political Science, University of Michigan
-
Teaching Fellow, School of Strategy, Marketing and Innovation, University of Portsmouth
-
Professor of Intelligence and National Security & Dean of Faculty, University of Hull
-
Professor of Government, Wesleyan University