Australia’s carbon credit scheme largely fails to protect threatened species, despite assumptions to the contrary. The findings provide cautionary lessons for the nature repair scheme.
Articles on Carbon credit
Displaying all articles
A group of agricultural and soil scientists has serious concerns about the way credits are awarded for soil carbon sequestration in Australia.
Companies are using these credits to offset their emissions, though many projects won’t meaningfully reduce carbon in the atmosphere.
Australia’s international reputation depends on rejecting the use of Kyoto carry-over. More importantly, so does our climate.
Top contributors
-
Professor & Director, Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre, The University of Melbourne
-
Adjunct Professor, University of New England
-
Professor of Soil & Landscape Science, Curtin University
-
Honorary Senior Fellow, The University of Melbourne
-
Adjunct Senior Research Fellow, University of New England
-
Adjunct Associate Professor, Queensland University of Technology
-
Professor, University of New England
-
Professor of Earth System Science, UCL
-
Professor of Global Change Science at University of Leeds, UCL
-
Professor of Global Change, Queensland University of Technology
-
Professor of Sustainable Agriculture, University of Tasmania
-
Research Fellow, Queensland University of Technology
-
Senior Industry Fellow, Environment and Planning, RMIT University
-
Professor, Queensland University of Technology
-
Fellow - Melbourne Law School; Senior Researcher - Climate Council; Associate - Australian-German Climate and Energy College, The University of Melbourne