Revenge porn law is failing victims – here’s why
YouTube celebrity Chrissy Chambers has won damages in a landmark revenge porn case. But not all victims of such abuse will have her means.
YouTube celebrity Chrissy Chambers has won damages in a landmark revenge porn case. But not all victims of such abuse will have her means.
The internet, smartphones and social media mean that extensive sharing of private images without consent is far easier than in the past. And the severity of the harm victims suffer is far greater.
Just as domestic violence was once misunderstood and tolerated, many today fail to grasp how nude photographs can be wielded as weapons of abuse.
People can now use artificial intelligence to swap the faces of actors in pornographic videos with those of people they know, raising fears about a new form of revenge porn.
Victims of image based sexual abuse deserve legal clarity.
A high-profile conviction for a crime that is not taken seriously enough is a victory for the victim and campaigners.
With a Senate inquiry into “revenge porn” due to report, the focus must be on changing the law to better protect victims.
Highly distressing and intrusive, but not illegal.
Coronavirus has meant more time at home, more time online and more image-based abuse.
Describing non-consensual acts as pornography minimises the importance of consent.